Wednesday:
no running. mental break.
0 miles
I call this test equivocal because I think one would think after six weeks of steady running one's times would improve. But, this type of training is HR based not pace based. But, one's paces should and will improve after one gets a decent base built. The one thing I have done differently is my overall mileage volume. Compared to the training plan, my mileage has been quite low. Over the next four weeks it is my goal to up the mileage to the 80 mile per week range and see how the efforts and times go. If I can do that I will attempt to repeat the test in four weeks.
Here are the two tests compared:
HR's: 120 130 140 150 160
9/12 - - 9:19 8:33 8:00
(143) (153) (162)
6.13 5.43 5.20
10/23 11:43 11:45 10:44 9:45 8:44
(123) (129) (137) (148) (157)
7.50 7.51 7.12 6.32 5.52
*parentheses are my HR, below is pace.
as I stated earlier, I ran this test with ease. i overshot the HR's last time and running the 160 range was very difficult. as you can see my HR at the 150 and 160 range is five beats lower than the last test, thus the drastic change in pace. believe me, five beats is a lot!! this morning the 150 and 160 range was easy and just two weekends ago I ran a 1/2 marathon at HR ave. 160.
After digesting this for a bit, I believe that this is decent progress over a short time at relatively low mileage.
Totals: 11.1 miles with warm up and test.
2 comments:
For what it's worth, your numbers look pretty similar to mine (I just wish my paces were as fast). My final Hadd level is 155 bpm, and my avg HM HR is 157. Marathon avg HR 152-153.
Interesting... I sure hope this Hadd-style is going to help in the future. I've decided to just keep on the same path and see where it brings me in the spring. The one thing interesting so far is the ability to hold the higher HR for a 1/2 marathon with very minimal training. If things keep improving at this rate, I should be able to hold 153-156 for a marathon. Just need to get the pace faster!
Post a Comment